2013-11-04 04:40:04 UTC
AlterNet  / By Lynn Stuart Parramore 
Skyway Robbery: 6 Ways the Out-of-Control Airline Industry Is Ripping Off America
November 1, 2013 |
High-fives are happening on Wall Street. Airlines are making giant profits again, record-breaking  profits! The days of bankruptcies, which peaked between 2001 and 2008, may soon be a memory.
Have bold thinking, dramatic innovation and better service turned things around? Not exactly.
Sky-high profits are coming at the expense of the taxpayers, airline workers, and the traveling public, particularly in North America, where carriers like Spirit Airlines have been adding fees in a nickel-and-diming rampage. It’s ugly up there, and it’s likely to get uglier.
Let’s take a look at what is turning into a nightmare in the sky.
1. Serving Wall Street
The small Czech town where I taught school in 1994, just after the Velvet Revolution, had exactly two phones. Frequently neither of them worked. It was maddeningly inconvenient, but like the snowy winters, people just thought of it as a fact of life to be endured, rather than the outcome of a particular kind of social and economic system that prioritized social control and central authority over free two-way communication between citizens.
Americans complain about flying the way people in communist countries used to complain about telephone service. Rarely do we reflect that the bad and limited service we endure is a result of our unregulated market economy, where corporate profits and limited government are prioritized over citizens’ access to affordable and reliable air travel.
How did we get here?
Back in 1978, a group of policy-makers cooked up a plan they thought would drive down the cost of airline fares by encouraging competition among airlines. In practice, what it did was pretty much get rid of the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB), which had overseen the industry. Phillip Longman and Lina Khan, in their eye-opening report, “Terminal Sickness ,” explained that the effect “was to shift control of the airline industry from experts answerable to the public to corporate boardrooms and Wall Street.”
For a long time, defenders of deregulation have claimed that it brought us lower prices for airline tickets (though nobody has argued that it brought better service). Turns out that recent research  delivers a serious blow to that claim. The reality may be that deregulation actually slowed a decline in ticket prices that was already underway.
Unfortunately, we have found that increased competition without adequate regulation is not much better than monopoly conditions.
John Kay, one of Britain’s leading economists, has discussed how competitive markets often fail, especially when the state doesn’t intervene to make sure that things are fair (like enforcing contracts) and that businesses are properly run. All kinds of things can go wrong, like fraud, capture of the political system, and so on. Kay describes how an especially destructive form of competition can develop in which companies battle with each other through sneaky practices, like charging low prices, but then extracting money through invisible and unavoidable additional fees. What you end up with is a scam-alicious race to the bottom where customers get screwed, thuggish executives get rich and public trust in business dissolves. Sound familiar?
When an industry as essential to life as air travel is cut loose from any public responsibility, not only individuals, but whole cities can be left economically stranded. Cincinnati, for example, has lost key businesses (like Chiquita, which moved to Charlotte) because carriers decided to hike fares and abandon service. Before deregulation, regulators working in the public interest could assign routes and set fares. Afterward, airlines were free to do pretty much whatever would bring short term-profits, often at the expense of whole communities.
Recently, the industry has moved back to playing Monopoly. United Airlines merged with Continental. AirTran purchased Southwest. Delta and Northwest are one. In early 2013, US Airways and American Airlines announced plans to merge and create the largest airline in the world. The Justice Department, five states, and the District of Columbia tried to stop  the plan, warning that higher prices would hit consumers. But the airlines are looking to settle the lawsuit , and the merger appears to be moving forward (the Obama adminstration seems to be focusing on other things). Consolidation will create its own nasty profit dynamic, as every child who has played Monopoly is aware.
Whether there’s less competition or more, the absence of regulation just about guarantees that things will not work out well for anybody except executives and financiers.
2. Mind-blowing fees
To illustrate a bit more what John Kay meant when he talked about destructive competition, we have Spirit Airlines.
CEO Ben Baldanza is one of America’s most thuggish corporateers, a libertarian on steroids who runs the Florida-based discount airline. Under his guidance, Spirit has perfected the art of luring unsuspecting customers with come-on fares, and then whacking them upside the head with unanticipated fees.
How would you like to go to the airport and be held up by a criminal who demands $100 before you can board your flight? That’s what happens to customers every day when they unwittingly buy a Spirit airline ticket without having read the sneaky fine print about carry-on fees (on Travelocity you would have to click through several pages as you book your ticket to realize what fees were in store for you).
You might arrive at the airport happy that you had avoided checked baggage fees by stuffing your belongings into a small rollaway. But Spirit has other plans for you. Just before you board, you are stopped and given a choice: fork over a Benjamin on the spot or see if you have time to run back down to the check-in counter to pay a fee of $45. Want to complain? The company will actually charge you to call the “customer service” number.
Twitter is constantly abuzz with travelers gobsmacked by this airport mugging. A recent sampling:
Oct 31, 9:31pm via HootSuite 
@phillihpz #spiritairlines …makes your bag cost more than the ticket ow.ly/qnJRN  #rt #retweet"
Oct 31, 7:33am via Twitter for Android 
Its not that I hate traveling, I hate the traveling process. Even more so when #spiritairlines has overcharge on carryon bags. #Worstairline"
Oct 29, 12:27pm via Twitter for Android 
You guys will go out of business #SpiritAirlines. With the schemes you guys pull? How can you possibly expect any customer loyalty. Fuck you"
With such constant fury directed toward the airline, you might think Spirit would indeed go out of business. In a normal, well-regulated business environment, it would. Instead, profits are soaring. Spirit does not care a fig if customers are pissed off, because it can jump around from city to city, luring in new victims with cheap tickets to tourist destinations like the Caribbean and Myrtle Beach. Some of the customers, particularly the poor ones, will learn how to navigate around the high fees. Maybe they’ll mail their clothes ahead to avoid the carry-on fee, chug water before boarding, and print out their ticket at home. Many simply won’t travel with Spirit again, but that’s okay, because there’s always another sucker.
These dirty practices have spawned multiple Spirit-hating Facebook pages, websites decrying the airline’s abuse, and even an Onion parody of an FAA report :
"The FAA has come to the determination that Spirit Airlines treats its customers like pieces of shit and that everyone should boycott this airline," the report read in part, adding that there are so many hidden fucking fees that it makes customers want to blow their brains out. "The airline touts its low fares, but it costs $45 to check your bag at the airport, and if you don’t check the bag when you get your ticket, it costs a mandatory $100 at the gate. So the flight could end up costing over $300 anyway.
"You’ve got to be fucking kidding with this bullshit," the report added."
Spirit Airlines is not kidding. In fact, the company is now mulling a plan to jack up fees even higher  on peak travel days. Spirit now makes 41 percent of its revenues in fees . Shares have doubled since Spirit went public two years ago and Wall Street is jumping for joy.
How can all this be legal? Congress has been asking the same thing. Senator Barbara Boxer has slammed the airline for hustling customers , and Senator Chuck Schumer has called their practices “skyway robbery.”  There have been harsh words and legislation proposed , but Spirit just continues to shove its middle finger in America’s face. Last year it added a $2 fee  in direct defiance of new Department of Transportation consumer regulations. Spirit has been hit with record fines, such as a $375,000 fine in 2009, for failing to comply with DOT regulations , and $100,000 for screwing disabled passengers , but what does that matter when you’re hauling in $61 million in profits in the last quarter  alone?
When Wall Street is winning, it matters little that the public is losing.
Spirit Airlines is the grand-champion of price-gouging (there are 70 different fees  so far), but it certainly isn’t alone. Other airlines, eyeing Spirit’s profits enviously, are stumbling over themselves to get in the game. Hawaiian Airlines will ream you for $200 if you dare to change your flight. Allegiant Travel demands up to $25 for a pillow and blanket . Lufthansa will hit you with up to $800 in fees for an oversized bag . Ireland-based Ryanair has even considered charging passengers to use the toilet!
Fines socked on helpless consumers make oodles of money for executives. Baggage fees alone now account for 25 percent of the ancillary revenue  generated by airlines, up 5 percent from last year.
3. Terrible service
With all that money you're forking over, you might expect decent service. Mwa-ha-ha! laughs the airline executive.
In the U.S., the Department of Transportation  is currently responsible for the airline industry and even has a specific division called the Aviation Consumer Protection Service  that deals airline complaints (hint: always register your complaint with the DOT — airlines at least have to respond, and it costs them time and money). The number of complaints consumers filed with the DOT overall skyrocketed  by one-fifth last year to 11,445 complaints, up from 9,414 in 2011.
It’s not hard to figure out why. There are the basic aggravations of higher ticket prices, stuffing more people into each flight and reducing service staff. Then there are the horror stories — almost everybody has one. Like United Airlines running out of toilet paper  on a long flight and making passengers use napkins. Or U.S. Airways forcing passengers to stand for hours  because their seats are unavailable. On it goes.
Perversely, Virgin America, the U.S. company that has the lowest number of customer service complaints according to an annual ranking  done by Wichita State University and Perdue, is having trouble turning a profit . If anything illustrates the insanity of what unregulated capitalism has wrought, this would be it. In the airline industry, you can’t succeed by making customers happy.
4. Pushing credit cards
Another popular way for companies to bait the hook is to entice customers with credit cards. Passengers on Spirit Airlines are treated to flight attendants walking up and down the aisles barraging them with credit card pitches and distributing brochures. The airline knows that it can generate revenue when you use the card and that you’ll be more likely to get locked into the airline.
The game is to offer big sign-up rewards, then stick it to customers with credit cards that feature sky-high fees, overly complicated cash-back systems, and points that expire unknowingly. Kevin Hunt of the Hartford Courant reports  that “almost three-quarters of Americans who collect frequent-flyer miles or credit-card rewards points don’t know how many they have.” Princeton Survey Research Associates International, which conducted the study, also found that only 41 percent of Americans even understand how frequent-flyer programs work.
That's just fine with the airlines. What you don't know lines their pockets.
5. Screwing taxpayers
The airlines are subsidized by taxpayers nine ways to Sunday. The industry would not exist in the first place unless taxpayers, through the government, had not funded the massive research effort needed to produce the first passenger airlines, or forked over the money to build the country’s airports (New York’s La Guardia was a New Deal project).
As Stephanus Surjaputra of Consumer Traveler points out :
“From the first days of flight up until the 1970s, taxpayers, through the federal government, provided more than $155 billion in direct support for the aviation industry. Even after deregulation, federal and local governments have continued to provide infrastructure support, tax exemptions and low-cost financing. For example, the government has provided $4.64 billion in taxpayer funds for cash grants and $1.65 billion in loan guarantees in case the airline loan defaults.
After September 11, the industry received approximately $8 billion in federal assistance that continued even after most airlines returned to profitability. Furthermore, the federal pension reform legislation that was passed in 2004 and 2006 provided relief to the airlines valued at more than $3 billion.”
What return are taxpayers getting on that gargantuan investment? An industry hellbent on destroying middle-class jobs, privatizing contracts and crushing unions. One that is rife with consumer abuse and poor safety standards. Companies that strip worker health benefits and retirement plans, throwing the burden back on society as impoverished employees and former workers are forced to rely on government assistance. And so on.
Here’s a radical idea: If you take money from the taxpayers, you should actually do something to benefit the public in return. Just sayin’!
6. Screwing workers
Airline workers have been hit with enormous wage and benefit reductions since 2001. As Carl Finamore has written :
“In the last few years, bankruptcy courts ripped apart the wages and benefits of hundreds of thousands of employees. Based on long experience, veteran airline employees realize that good times returning to the carriers does not automatically mean good wages and benefits returning to them.”
Consolidation is not likely to improve things.
Take the American Airlines merger. American’s bankruptcy already triggered layoffs and pay cuts for flight attendants. Airport staff who do their jobs on the ground for things like wheelchair service are currently paid substandard wages (like $8 per hour). The proposed merger includes $86 million in executive compensation but no reforms to subcontracting practices related to ground staff.
In addition to reaming consumers and taxpayers, the airline industry is clearly bent on making profits by maintaining insecure, impoverished conditions for the people who do the work. It plans to send maintenance jobs overseas, ditch contracts, walk away from retirees and dump the costs on the rest of us.
How that for friendly skies? Like the old communist telephone service, it doesn’t have to be like this. But we have to decide once again that corporate America exists not just to make short-term profits that enrich executives, but for the benefit of the taxpayers, workers, and citizens that allow it to exist.
Source URL: http://www.alternet.org/economy/airline-rip-offs
Links:  http://alternet.org  http://www.alternet.org/authors/lynn-stuart-parramore  http://www.nbcnews.com/travel/how-airlines-are-nickel-diming-their-way-record-revenue-8C11488196  http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/march_april_2012/features/terminal_sickness035756.php?page=all  http://journals.oregondigital.org/trforum/article/view/986  http://www.justice.gov/atr/cases/f299900/299968.pdf  http://abcnews.go.com/Travel/wireStory/american-us-airways-aim-settle-merger-lawsuit-20739311  http://twitter.com/FSpiritAir1  http://twitter.com/FSpiritAir1/status/396087062220517377  http://t.co/4lIOcaYEYG  http://twitter.com/JMart0885  http://twitter.com/JMart0885/status/395876188742094849  http://twitter.com/J_OtheILLEST  http://twitter.com/J_OtheILLEST/status/395225474315870208  http://www.theonion.com/articles/faa-report-spirit-airlines-is-the-fucking-worst,32371/  http://www.travelweekly.com/Travel-News/Airline-News/Spirit-Airlines-mulls-tying-fees-to-flight-demand/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TravelWeeklysTopStories+%28Travel+Weekly%27s+Top+Stories%29  http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/01/business/spirit-airlines-banks-on-few-frills-and-more-fees.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0.  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/26/boxer-slams-spirit-on-dot-regulations_n_1234204.html  http://articles.latimes.com/2010/apr/19/business/la-fi-travelbriefcase19-2010apr19  http://www.examiner.com/article/government-legislation-to-challenge-spirit-airlines-carry-on-baggage-fees  http://avstop.com/news_february_2012/spirit_airlines_adds_2_fee_in_defiance_to_new_dot_consumer_regulations.htm  http://elliott.org/blog/spirit-airlines-smacked-with-record-375000-fine-for-consumer-rules-violations/  http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jan/27/business/la-fi-mo-spirit-airlines-fine-20120127  http://atwonline.com/finance-amp-data/spirit-airlines-earns-61-million-3q-net-profit-33-revenue-rise  http://www.spirit.com/OptionalServices  http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2013/05/05/is-this-outlandish-airline-fee-a-game-changer.aspx  http://www.gadling.com/2013/04/21/sneaky-and-insane-international-air-fees-to-avoid/  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Transportation  http://airconsumer.ost.dot.gov/  http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/04/08/airline-passenger-complaints-rise-despite-improvements/  http://www.dailyfinance.com/on/united-americas-worst-airline-no-toilet-paper/  http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2011/11/23/worst-flight-ever-passenger-forced-to-stand-7-hours-due-to-400lb-seat-mate/  http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/08/business/at-virgin-america-a-fine-line-between-pizazz-and-profit.html  http://skift.com/2013/06/02/best-and-worst-airlines-for-miles-points-and-redemption/  http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/after-years-of-airline-subsidies-how-about-a-payback-for-taxpayers/#sthash.dH39exS7.dpuf  http://socialistworker.org/2010/10/26/why-are-airline-profits-soaring  http://www.alternet.org/tags/acquisition  http://www.alternet.org/tags/airtrans  http://www.alternet.org/tags/airline-0  http://www.alternet.org/tags/allegiant-travel  http://www.alternet.org/tags/america  http://www.alternet.org/tags/american-airlines-0  http://www.alternet.org/tags/ancillary-revenue  http://www.alternet.org/tags/aviation-consumer-protection-service  http://www.alternet.org/tags/aviation-0  http://www.alternet.org/tags/barbara-boxer  http://www.alternet.org/tags/ben-baldanza  http://www.alternet.org/tags/business-0  http://www.alternet.org/tags/ceo  http://www.alternet.org/tags/caribbean-0  http://www.alternet.org/tags/carl-finamore  http://www.alternet.org/tags/charlotte  http://www.alternet.org/tags/chuck-schumer-0  http://www.alternet.org/tags/cincinnati  http://www.alternet.org/tags/civil-aeronautics-board  http://www.alternet.org/tags/civil-aviation  http://www.alternet.org/tags/company-location  http://www.alternet.org/tags/congress-0  http://www.alternet.org/tags/continental  http://www.alternet.org/tags/department-justice  http://www.alternet.org/tags/department-transportation  http://www.alternet.org/tags/district-columbia  http://www.alternet.org/tags/facebook-0  http://www.alternet.org/tags/federal-aviation-administration  http://www.alternet.org/tags/florida-0  http://www.alternet.org/tags/hartford-courant  http://www.alternet.org/tags/hawaiian-airlines  http://www.alternet.org/tags/ipo-0  http://www.alternet.org/tags/ireland-0  http://www.alternet.org/tags/john-kay  http://www.alternet.org/tags/kevin-hunt  http://www.alternet.org/tags/lina-khan  http://www.alternet.org/tags/low-cost-airlines  http://www.alternet.org/tags/low-cost-carrier  http://www.alternet.org/tags/merger-0  http://www.alternet.org/tags/myrtle-beach  http://www.alternet.org/tags/new-york  http://www.alternet.org/tags/north-america  http://www.alternet.org/tags/northwest-0  http://www.alternet.org/tags/open-travel-alliance  http://www.alternet.org/tags/person-career  http://www.alternet.org/tags/person-location  http://www.alternet.org/tags/phillip-longman  http://www.alternet.org/tags/quotation  http://www.alternet.org/tags/ryanair  http://www.alternet.org/tags/southwest-0  http://www.alternet.org/tags/spirit-airlines  http://www.alternet.org/tags/star-alliance  http://www.alternet.org/tags/terminal-sickness  http://www.alternet.org/tags/transport-0  http://www.alternet.org/tags/twitter-0  http://www.alternet.org/tags/us-airways  http://www.alternet.org/tags/usd  http://www.alternet.org/tags/united-airlines-0  http://www.alternet.org/tags/united-kingdom  http://www.alternet.org/tags/united-states  http://www.alternet.org/tags/virgin-america  http://www.alternet.org/tags/wichita-state-university  http://www.alternet.org/tags/air-travel-0  http://www.alternet.org/tags/airline-complaints  http://www.alternet.org/tags/airline-fares  http://www.alternet.org/tags/airline-industry  http://www.alternet.org/tags/airline-loan  http://www.alternet.org/tags/airline-ticket  http://www.alternet.org/%2Bnew_src%2B
Adam Smith pointed out in his 1776 book The Wealth of Nations, the only way to create real wealth is to make things. Economies are built from the ground up and when an economy doesn't have a strong base of well-paying manufacturing jobs, it doesn't produce enough wealth to stay healthy
neo-liberalism is the death of the american economy. obama became president for one reason only, to serve the wealthy.
if you elect a neo-liberal democrat, or a republican, the results always end up the same way.
America Was Once a Superpower - Now It's Not
Wednesday, 30 October 2013 14:34 By The Daily Take, The Thom Hartmann Program | Op-Ed
George Washington would be rolling over in his grave if he knew what President Obama was up to.
Right now, the president is preparing push through what has the potential to be the largest trade deal in human history: the Trans-Pacific Partnership, or as it's more commonly known as, the "TPP."
If approved, the TPP would create a whole new set of rules regulating the economies of twelve countries in four different continents bordering the Pacific Ocean. These rules cover everything from pharmaceuticals to digital copyright law and could permanently change the way every day Americans and people all over the world interact with the global economy.
So, you'd think Obama administration would want to keep the public as up-to-date as possible on such a big trade deal, right?
The United States has negotiated the TPP almost entirely in secret and most of what we know about it actually comes from leaked documents.
And those documents paint a pretty scary picture. According to Public Citizen's Trade Watch, TPP would allow private foreign corporations to sue countries that try to pass regulations they don't like, reward companies that send jobs overseas, and gut regulations that keep big banks in check.
That's why the TPP is way more dangerous than normal trade deals like NAFTA. As Dean Baker wrote in a recent piece for the Huffington Post, "[Free trade] is not what the TPP is about. The TPP is about crafting rules that will favor big business at the expense of the rest of the population in both the United States and in other countries."
So why is the TPP so friendly to big corporations?
Easy – they wrote it.
While the Bush and Obama administrations have kept the public in the dark about what's in the TPP, they have let big corporations to look at draft versions of the treaty and even let those corporations make changes to them.
It shouldn't be any surprise, then, that President Obama doesn't even want Congress to look at the TPP.
To push the U.S. the onto the proposed treaty as soon as possible, he's proposing a special legislative trick called "fast-tracking" that would prevent lawmakers from making any amendments to the TPP. Instead, the treaty would be sent right to the floor where it would only have to pass a simple majority vote.
Given what we know about the TPP and what we know about how the President wants to push it through Congress without debate or amendment, the stakes couldn't be higher.
For over 200 years, since the founding of the Republic, our economy was built on a system of tariffs, which are small taxes on importing goods. These tariffs made American goods cheaper in the United States, thus protecting American manufacturing, and made our country a global superpower.
American businesses and American workers didn't have to compete with cheap products or cheap labor from abroad, and so the economy flourished.
Everything worked fine until the 1980s when President Ronald Reagan abandoned the system of tariffs that had worked so well for centuries and ushered in the era of so-called "free-trade."
Every President since, including Democrats like Bill Clinton and Republicans like George W. Bush, has followed Reagan's lead, signing us on to free-trade deals like NAFTA and CAFTA. These deals were supposed to grow the economy, but instead they decimated its industrial base, its most productive source of wealth.
As a result, the United States is now what Economy in Crisis has called a "service (or servant) economy." In most parts of the country factory jobs have been replaced by non-union service-sector jobs.
There's nothing wrong with working at some place like McDonald's or Walmart, but the fact of the matter is that Walmart jobs don't pay nearly as well as a good union factory job does. As Adam Smith pointed out in his 1776 book The Wealth of Nations, the only way to create real wealth is to make things. Economies are built from the ground up and when an economy doesn't have a strong base of well-paying manufacturing jobs, it doesn't produce enough wealth to stay healthy.
Thirty years of tariff-busting and so-called free-trade have already changed our country's economy for the worse. If President Obama gets his way and pushes the TPP through Congress, it could put the middle-class on death watch.
There's still a lot we don't know about the TPP, but what we do know– the giveaways to Big Pharma and the bankster class, the privileges for job-killing outsourcers, and the courts that let corporations fight regulations – would put the final nail in the coffin of the economic system our Founders created.
The TPP would complete the transformation of our economy from one that produces wealth to one that bleeds wealth. The only people who would benefit from it would be the same class of people who have benefited from every trade teal and anti-tariff bill since the Reagan administration: the banksters, corporate lawyers, and CEOs who have spent the past three decades fleecing the American people.
In a perfect world, President Obama would reject the TPP outright. But we're not in a perfect world, so at the very least he should let the American people – and our Congress – see what's in the treaty.