Discussion:
no matter how many countries we destabilize, no matter how many we displace, murder, steal their democracies, free trade will not work: The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
(too old to reply)
nickname unavailable
2016-06-13 02:45:02 UTC
Permalink
no matter how many countries we destabilize, no matter how many we displace, murder, steal their democracies, free trade will not work: The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales

i fear for the safety of the world from a free trader more than trump.


http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article44851.htm



The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
By Nil Nikandrov
June 11, 2016 "Information Clearing House" - "SCF" - US intelligence agencies have ramped up their operations intended to remove Bolivian President Evo Morales from office. All options are on the table, including assassination. Barack Obama, who sees the weakening of Latin America’s “hostile bloc of populist states” as one of his administration’s foreign-policy victories, intends to buoy this success before stepping down.
Washington also feels under the gun in Bolivia because of China’s successful expansion in the country. Morales is steadily strengthening his financial, economic, trade, and military relationship with Beijing. Chinese businesses in La Paz are thriving – making investments and loans and taking part in projects to secure a key position for Bolivia in the modernization of the continent’s transportation industry. In the next 10 years, thanks to Bolivia’s plentiful gas reserves, that country will become the energy hub of South America. Evo Morales sees his country’s development as his top priority, and the Chinese, unlike the Americans, have always viewed Bolivia as an ally and partner in a relationship that eschews double standards.
The US embassy in La Paz has been without an ambassador since 2008. He was declared persona non grata because of his subversive activities. The interim chargé d’affaires is currently Peter Brennan, and pointed questions have been raised about what agency he truly works for. He was previously stationed in Pakistan, where “difficult decisions” had to be made about assassinations, but most of his career has been spent handling Latin American countries. In particular, Brennan was responsible for introducing the ZunZuneo service into Cuba (an illegal program dubbed the “Cuban Twitter”). USAID fronted this CIA program, under the innocent pretext of helping to inform Cubans about cultural and sporting events and other international news. Once ZunZuneo was in place, there were plans to use this program to mobilize the population in preparation for a “Cuban Spring”. When reading about Brennan one often encounters the phrase – “dark horse”. He is used to getting what he wants, at any cost, and his tight deadline in Bolivia (before the end of Obama’s presidency) is forcing Brennan to take great risks.
Previously, Brennan had “distinguished himself” during the run-up to the referendum on allowing President Evo Morales to run for reelection in 2019, as well as during the vote itself. To encourage “no” votes, the US embassy mobilized its entire propaganda machine, roused to action the NGOs under its control, and allocated considerable additional funds for the staging of protests. It is telling that many of those culminated in the burning of photographs of Morales wearing his presidential sash. A record-setting volley of dirt was fired at the president. Accusations of corruption were the most common, although Morales has always been open about his personal finances. It would have been hard to pin ownership of “$43 billion in offshore accounts” on him, as was done to Hugo Chávez and Fidel Castro.
Brennan also has agreements in place with Washington about other operations to compromise the Bolivian president. An attack was launched by the CIA agent Carlos Valverde Bravo, a well-known TV journalist and former agent with Bolivia’s security services. In his Feb. 3 program he accused Morales’s former companion, Gabriela Zapata, the commercial manager of the Chinese company CAMC Engineering Co, of orchestrating shady business deals worth $500 million. Insinuations simultaneously began circulating on the Internet about the Bolivian president’s involvement in those, although Morales completely broke ties with Zapata back in 2007 and has spared no individual, regardless of name and rank, in his battle against corruption.
The “exposés” staged by the US embassy continued until the day of the referendum itself on Feb. 21, 2016. The “no” votes prevailed, despite the favorable trend that had been indicated in the voter polls. Morales accepted defeat with his Indian equanimity, but in his statements after the referendum he was clear that the US embassy had waged a hostile campaign.
The investigation into Gabriela Zapata revealed that she had capitalized on her previous relationship with Morales to further her career. She was offered a position with the Chinese company CAMC and took possession of a luxury home in an upscale neighborhood in La Paz, making a big show of her “closeness” to the Bolivian leader, although he played no role in any of this. This was the same reason she tried to initiate a business and personal relationship with the president’s chief of staff, Juan Ramón Quintana. He has categorically denied having ever met Zapata.
Gradually, all the CIA’s fabricated evidence disintegrated. Zapata is now testifying, and her lawyer has holed up abroad because his contacts with the Americans have been exposed. The American agent Valverde Bravo has fled to Argentina. Accusations against Morales are being hurled from there with renewed vigor. The attack continues. It’s all quite logical: a continually repeated lie is an effective weapon in this newest generation of information warfare. The latest example was the ouster of Dilma Rousseff, who was accused of corruption by officials whom her government had identified as corrupt!
The US military has been increasing its presence in Bolivia in recent months. For example, Colonel Felando Pierre Thigpen visited the department of Santa Cruz, where there are strong separatist leanings. Thigpen is known to be involved in a joint program between the Pentagon and CIA to recruit and train potential personnel for American intelligence. In commentary by Bolivian bloggers and in publications about Thigpen, it is noted that the colonel was dispatched to the country on the eve of events related to “the impending replacement of a government that has exhausted its potential, as well as the need to recruit alternative young personalities into the new leadership structure.” Some comments have indicated that Thigpen is overseeing the work of diplomats Peter Brennan and Erik Foronda, a media and press advisor at the US embassy.
The embassy responded by stating that Thigpen had arrived in Bolivia “at his own initiative”, but it is no secret that he was invited to “work with youth” by NGOs that coordinate their activities with the Americans: the Foundation for Leadership and Integral Development (FULIDEI), the Global Transformation Network (RTG), the Bolivian School of Heroes (EHB), and others. So Thigpen’s work is not being improvised, but is rather a direct challenge to Morales’s government. Domestically, the far-right party Christian Democratic Party provides him with political cover.
The US plans to destabilize Bolivia – which were provided to Evo Morales’s government by an unnamed friendly country – include a step-by-step chronogram of the actions plotted by the Americans. For example: “To spark hunger strikes and mass mobilizations and to stir up conflicts within universities, civil organizations, indigenous communities, and varied social circles, as well as within government institutions. To strike up acquaintances with both active-duty and retired military officers, with the goal of undercutting the government’s credibility within the armed forces. It is absolutely essential to train the military for a crisis scenario, so that in an atmosphere of growing social conflict they will lead an uprising against the regime and support the protests in order to ensure a peaceful transition to democracy.”
The program’s first fruits have been the emergence of social protests (recent marches by disabled citizens were staged at the suggestion of the American embassy), although Evo Morales’s administration has evinced more concern for the interests of Bolivians on a limited income than any other government in the history of Bolivia.
The scope of the operation to oust President Morales – financed and directed by US intelligence agencies – continues to expand. The Americans’ biggest adversary in Latin America has been sentenced to a fate of “neutralization”. Speaking out against Evo Morales, the radical opposition has openly alluded to the fact that it has been a long time since the region has seen a really newsworthy air crash involving a politician who was hostile to Washington...
Bret Cahill
2016-06-13 03:43:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by nickname unavailable
no matter how many countries we destabilize, no matter how many we displace, murder, steal their democracies, free trade will not work: The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
i fear for the safety of the world from a free trader more than trump.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article44851.htm
The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
By Nil Nikandrov
June 11, 2016 "Information Clearing House" - "SCF" - US intelligence agencies have ramped up their operations intended to remove Bolivian President Evo Morales from office. All options are on the table, including assassination. Barack Obama, who sees the weakening of Latin America’s “hostile bloc of populist states” as one of his administration’s foreign-policy victories, intends to buoy this success before stepping down.
Washington also feels under the gun in Bolivia because of China’s successful expansion in the country. Morales is steadily strengthening his financial, economic, trade, and military relationship with Beijing. Chinese businesses in La Paz are thriving – making investments and loans and taking part in projects to secure a key position for Bolivia in the modernization of the continent’s transportation industry. In the next 10 years, thanks to Bolivia’s plentiful gas reserves, that country will become the energy hub of South America. Evo Morales sees his country’s development as his top priority, and the Chinese, unlike the Americans, have always viewed Bolivia as an ally and partner in a relationship that eschews double standards.
Unless it's a war few voters care about international affairs.

Again, the only effective political action at this point is to expose the big lies of the legacy media. Every other activism is either useless or a new evil.

"When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils, but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil."

-- Montesquieu
nickname unavailable
2016-06-13 04:06:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
no matter how many countries we destabilize, no matter how many we displace, murder, steal their democracies, free trade will not work: The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
i fear for the safety of the world from a free trader more than trump.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article44851.htm
The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
By Nil Nikandrov
June 11, 2016 "Information Clearing House" - "SCF" - US intelligence agencies have ramped up their operations intended to remove Bolivian President Evo Morales from office. All options are on the table, including assassination. Barack Obama, who sees the weakening of Latin America’s “hostile bloc of populist states” as one of his administration’s foreign-policy victories, intends to buoy this success before stepping down.
Washington also feels under the gun in Bolivia because of China’s successful expansion in the country. Morales is steadily strengthening his financial, economic, trade, and military relationship with Beijing. Chinese businesses in La Paz are thriving – making investments and loans and taking part in projects to secure a key position for Bolivia in the modernization of the continent’s transportation industry. In the next 10 years, thanks to Bolivia’s plentiful gas reserves, that country will become the energy hub of South America. Evo Morales sees his country’s development as his top priority, and the Chinese, unlike the Americans, have always viewed Bolivia as an ally and partner in a relationship that eschews double standards.
Unless it's a war few voters care about international affairs.
when the missiles hit their doorsteps, they will care.
Post by Bret Cahill
Again, the only effective political action at this point is to expose the big lies of the legacy media. Every other activism is either useless or a new evil.
its a two for one affair now, as it always has been.
Post by Bret Cahill
"When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils, but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil."
-- Montesquieu
wasserman shultz backed off, even though she had full support of the legacy media, because we rightfully demonized her.
Bret Cahill
2016-06-13 04:43:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
no matter how many countries we destabilize, no matter how many we displace, murder, steal their democracies, free trade will not work: The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
i fear for the safety of the world from a free trader more than trump.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article44851.htm
The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
By Nil Nikandrov
June 11, 2016 "Information Clearing House" - "SCF" - US intelligence agencies have ramped up their operations intended to remove Bolivian President Evo Morales from office. All options are on the table, including assassination. Barack Obama, who sees the weakening of Latin America’s “hostile bloc of populist states” as one of his administration’s foreign-policy victories, intends to buoy this success before stepping down.
Washington also feels under the gun in Bolivia because of China’s successful expansion in the country. Morales is steadily strengthening his financial, economic, trade, and military relationship with Beijing. Chinese businesses in La Paz are thriving – making investments and loans and taking part in projects to secure a key position for Bolivia in the modernization of the continent’s transportation industry. In the next 10 years, thanks to Bolivia’s plentiful gas reserves, that country will become the energy hub of South America. Evo Morales sees his country’s development as his top priority, and the Chinese, unlike the Americans, have always viewed Bolivia as an ally and partner in a relationship that eschews double standards.
Unless it's a war few voters care about international affairs.
when the missiles hit their doorsteps, they will care.
Bolivia has no missiles.

Voters don't care what the U. S. does in these countries.
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Again, the only effective political action at this point is to expose the big lies of the legacy media. Every other activism is either useless or a new evil.
its a two for one affair now, as it always has been.
There's only one field operation at a time.
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
"When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils, but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil."
-- Montesquieu
wasserman shultz backed off, even though she had full support of the legacy media, because we rightfully demonized her.
They get someone even worse.


Bret Cahill
nickname unavailable
2016-06-13 16:08:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
no matter how many countries we destabilize, no matter how many we displace, murder, steal their democracies, free trade will not work: The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
i fear for the safety of the world from a free trader more than trump.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article44851.htm
The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
By Nil Nikandrov
June 11, 2016 "Information Clearing House" - "SCF" - US intelligence agencies have ramped up their operations intended to remove Bolivian President Evo Morales from office. All options are on the table, including assassination. Barack Obama, who sees the weakening of Latin America’s “hostile bloc of populist states” as one of his administration’s foreign-policy victories, intends to buoy this success before stepping down.
Washington also feels under the gun in Bolivia because of China’s successful expansion in the country. Morales is steadily strengthening his financial, economic, trade, and military relationship with Beijing. Chinese businesses in La Paz are thriving – making investments and loans and taking part in projects to secure a key position for Bolivia in the modernization of the continent’s transportation industry. In the next 10 years, thanks to Bolivia’s plentiful gas reserves, that country will become the energy hub of South America. Evo Morales sees his country’s development as his top priority, and the Chinese, unlike the Americans, have always viewed Bolivia as an ally and partner in a relationship that eschews double standards.
Unless it's a war few voters care about international affairs.
when the missiles hit their doorsteps, they will care.
Bolivia has no missiles.
Voters don't care what the U. S. does in these countries.
but china does. china has billions invested in bolivia, as it does in many other countries we are destabilizing all over the world to keep china a colony.
same thing is happening with europe and its increased trade with russia. this will all end poorly, free trade always does. free trade is used as a hammer, to tie others to us. it works in the short term when we have something to offer, but in the long term once we have nothing, which we warned clinton that would happen soon.
we saw it in 2000 when 65,000 factories went to china, then what do we have left to offer, technology, nope, that's gone, we are a net importer of technology. manufactured products, nope, same there. financial products, we see how well that worked, the dollar and the military, that's it.
so if you do not understand why the hillay type is so eager to destroy your constitution, your country, your sovereignty, your standard of living, its in the vain hope to hang onto empire.
free trade always ends in war. i fear a free trader in office more than trump. china nor russia will not stand for this for long.
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Again, the only effective political action at this point is to expose the big lies of the legacy media. Every other activism is either useless or a new evil.
its a two for one affair now, as it always has been.
There's only one field operation at a time.
no two.
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
"When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils, but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil."
-- Montesquieu
wasserman shultz backed off, even though she had full support of the legacy media, because we rightfully demonized her.
They get someone even worse.
the one running against her is endorsed by bernie.
Post by Bret Cahill
Bret Cahill
Bret Cahill
2016-06-13 16:52:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
no matter how many countries we destabilize, no matter how many we displace, murder, steal their democracies, free trade will not work: The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
i fear for the safety of the world from a free trader more than trump.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article44851.htm
The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
By Nil Nikandrov
June 11, 2016 "Information Clearing House" - "SCF" - US intelligence agencies have ramped up their operations intended to remove Bolivian President Evo Morales from office. All options are on the table, including assassination. Barack Obama, who sees the weakening of Latin America’s “hostile bloc of populist states” as one of his administration’s foreign-policy victories, intends to buoy this success before stepping down.
Washington also feels under the gun in Bolivia because of China’s successful expansion in the country. Morales is steadily strengthening his financial, economic, trade, and military relationship with Beijing. Chinese businesses in La Paz are thriving – making investments and loans and taking part in projects to secure a key position for Bolivia in the modernization of the continent’s transportation industry. In the next 10 years, thanks to Bolivia’s plentiful gas reserves, that country will become the energy hub of South America. Evo Morales sees his country’s development as his top priority, and the Chinese, unlike the Americans, have always viewed Bolivia as an ally and partner in a relationship that eschews double standards.
Unless it's a war few voters care about international affairs.
when the missiles hit their doorsteps, they will care.
Bolivia has no missiles.
Voters don't care what the U. S. does in these countries.
but china does. china has billions invested in bolivia, as it does in many other countries we are destabilizing all over the world to keep china a colony.
same thing is happening with europe and its increased trade with russia. this will all end poorly, free trade always does. free trade is used as a hammer, to tie others to us. it works in the short term when we have something to offer, but in the long term once we have nothing, which we warned clinton that would happen soon.
we saw it in 2000 when 65,000 factories went to china, then what do we have left to offer, technology, nope, that's gone, we are a net importer of technology. manufactured products, nope, same there. financial products, we see how well that worked, the dollar and the military, that's it.
so if you do not understand why the hillay type is so eager to destroy your constitution, your country, your sovereignty, your standard of living, its in the vain hope to hang onto empire.
free trade always ends in war. i fear a free trader in office more than trump. china nor russia will not stand for this for long.
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Again, the only effective political action at this point is to expose the big lies of the legacy media. Every other activism is either useless or a new evil.
its a two for one affair now, as it always has been.
There's only one field operation at a time.
no two.
Two is unusual in farming, non existent in politics as Montesquieu pointed out.

You have one real operation now and driving a combine around in the field like what you want to do just kills all the sprouts.
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
"When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils, but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil."
-- Montesquieu
wasserman shultz backed off, even though she had full support of the legacy media, because we rightfully demonized her.
They get someone even worse.
the one running against her is endorsed by bernie.
How does that cause the next DNC chair to become progressive? They have a list of job applicants "this high" to replace one shill after another shill after another shill.

You may like mowing mushrooms but most like to actually _accomplish_ something.

You're entire approach to politics is "get rid of bad guys and utopia will break out."

Look how well that worked for W. Bush getting rid of bad guy Saddam.

Nader punished Al Gore and destroyed the middle class.

Punishment of evil doers does not cause utopia to break out because it is does not change the _situation_.

What part of "situation" do you not understand?

Unless someone does something about legacy media Big Lies, rest assured, the next _DNC chair_ will be even worse.


Bret Cahill


"You are satisfied with so little."

-- Nietzsche
nickname unavailable
2016-06-13 17:34:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
no matter how many countries we destabilize, no matter how many we displace, murder, steal their democracies, free trade will not work: The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
i fear for the safety of the world from a free trader more than trump.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article44851.htm
The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
By Nil Nikandrov
June 11, 2016 "Information Clearing House" - "SCF" - US intelligence agencies have ramped up their operations intended to remove Bolivian President Evo Morales from office. All options are on the table, including assassination. Barack Obama, who sees the weakening of Latin America’s “hostile bloc of populist states” as one of his administration’s foreign-policy victories, intends to buoy this success before stepping down.
Washington also feels under the gun in Bolivia because of China’s successful expansion in the country. Morales is steadily strengthening his financial, economic, trade, and military relationship with Beijing. Chinese businesses in La Paz are thriving – making investments and loans and taking part in projects to secure a key position for Bolivia in the modernization of the continent’s transportation industry. In the next 10 years, thanks to Bolivia’s plentiful gas reserves, that country will become the energy hub of South America. Evo Morales sees his country’s development as his top priority, and the Chinese, unlike the Americans, have always viewed Bolivia as an ally and partner in a relationship that eschews double standards.
Unless it's a war few voters care about international affairs.
when the missiles hit their doorsteps, they will care.
Bolivia has no missiles.
Voters don't care what the U. S. does in these countries.
but china does. china has billions invested in bolivia, as it does in many other countries we are destabilizing all over the world to keep china a colony.
same thing is happening with europe and its increased trade with russia. this will all end poorly, free trade always does. free trade is used as a hammer, to tie others to us. it works in the short term when we have something to offer, but in the long term once we have nothing, which we warned clinton that would happen soon.
we saw it in 2000 when 65,000 factories went to china, then what do we have left to offer, technology, nope, that's gone, we are a net importer of technology. manufactured products, nope, same there. financial products, we see how well that worked, the dollar and the military, that's it.
so if you do not understand why the hillay type is so eager to destroy your constitution, your country, your sovereignty, your standard of living, its in the vain hope to hang onto empire.
free trade always ends in war. i fear a free trader in office more than trump. china nor russia will not stand for this for long.
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Again, the only effective political action at this point is to expose the big lies of the legacy media. Every other activism is either useless or a new evil.
its a two for one affair now, as it always has been.
There's only one field operation at a time.
no two.
Two is unusual in farming, non existent in politics as Montesquieu pointed out.
You have one real operation now and driving a combine around in the field like what you want to do just kills all the sprouts.
modern combines have two sides. neo-liberals simply will not go away because the legacy media gets outed. out the shills everywhere, its the right thing to do.
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
"When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils, but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil."
-- Montesquieu
wasserman shultz backed off, even though she had full support of the legacy media, because we rightfully demonized her.
They get someone even worse.
the one running against her is endorsed by bernie.
How does that cause the next DNC chair to become progressive? They have a list of job applicants "this high" to replace one shill after another shill after another shill.
You may like mowing mushrooms but most like to actually _accomplish_ something.
You're entire approach to politics is "get rid of bad guys and utopia will break out."
Look how well that worked for W. Bush getting rid of bad guy Saddam.
Nader punished Al Gore and destroyed the middle class.
clinton destroyed the middle class. not bush, shame on you bret.
Post by Bret Cahill
Punishment of evil doers does not cause utopia to break out because it is does not change the _situation_.
What part of "situation" do you not understand?
Unless someone does something about legacy media Big Lies, rest assured, the next _DNC chair_ will be even worse.
the legacy media's demise will not prevent the next bill clinton. a informed public however will.
Post by Bret Cahill
Bret Cahill
"You are satisfied with so little."
-- Nietzsche
i will not be satisfied till the constitution is restored.
Bret Cahill
2016-06-13 20:23:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
no matter how many countries we destabilize, no matter how many we displace, murder, steal their democracies, free trade will not work: The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
i fear for the safety of the world from a free trader more than trump.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article44851.htm
The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
By Nil Nikandrov
June 11, 2016 "Information Clearing House" - "SCF" - US intelligence agencies have ramped up their operations intended to remove Bolivian President Evo Morales from office. All options are on the table, including assassination. Barack Obama, who sees the weakening of Latin America’s “hostile bloc of populist states” as one of his administration’s foreign-policy victories, intends to buoy this success before stepping down.
Washington also feels under the gun in Bolivia because of China’s successful expansion in the country. Morales is steadily strengthening his financial, economic, trade, and military relationship with Beijing. Chinese businesses in La Paz are thriving – making investments and loans and taking part in projects to secure a key position for Bolivia in the modernization of the continent’s transportation industry. In the next 10 years, thanks to Bolivia’s plentiful gas reserves, that country will become the energy hub of South America. Evo Morales sees his country’s development as his top priority, and the Chinese, unlike the Americans, have always viewed Bolivia as an ally and partner in a relationship that eschews double standards.
Unless it's a war few voters care about international affairs.
when the missiles hit their doorsteps, they will care.
Bolivia has no missiles.
Voters don't care what the U. S. does in these countries.
but china does. china has billions invested in bolivia, as it does in many other countries we are destabilizing all over the world to keep china a colony.
same thing is happening with europe and its increased trade with russia. this will all end poorly, free trade always does. free trade is used as a hammer, to tie others to us. it works in the short term when we have something to offer, but in the long term once we have nothing, which we warned clinton that would happen soon.
we saw it in 2000 when 65,000 factories went to china, then what do we have left to offer, technology, nope, that's gone, we are a net importer of technology. manufactured products, nope, same there. financial products, we see how well that worked, the dollar and the military, that's it.
so if you do not understand why the hillay type is so eager to destroy your constitution, your country, your sovereignty, your standard of living, its in the vain hope to hang onto empire.
free trade always ends in war. i fear a free trader in office more than trump. china nor russia will not stand for this for long.
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Again, the only effective political action at this point is to expose the big lies of the legacy media. Every other activism is either useless or a new evil.
its a two for one affair now, as it always has been.
There's only one field operation at a time.
no two.
Two is unusual in farming, non existent in politics as Montesquieu pointed out.
You have one real operation now and driving a combine around in the field like what you want to do just kills all the sprouts.
modern combines have two sides. neo-liberals simply will not go away because the legacy media gets outed.
But outing the media must be done _first_.

You're hungry for some food but you'll only get hungrier if you keep driving that combine around in the field.

There's no wheat there.
Post by nickname unavailable
out the shills everywhere, its the right thing to do.
It takes more than the right position papers.

You need to do the right issue at the right time.
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
"When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils, but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil."
-- Montesquieu
wasserman shultz backed off, even though she had full support of the legacy media, because we rightfully demonized her.
They get someone even worse.
the one running against her is endorsed by bernie.
How does that cause the next DNC chair to become progressive? They have a list of job applicants "this high" to replace one shill after another shill after another shill.
You may like mowing mushrooms but most like to actually _accomplish_ something.
You're entire approach to politics is "get rid of bad guys and utopia will break out."
Look how well that worked for W. Bush getting rid of bad guy Saddam.
Nader punished Al Gore and destroyed the middle class.
clinton destroyed the middle class.
You are dodging the issue:

Punishment based politics does not result in progress.
Post by nickname unavailable
not bush, shame on you bret.
Post by Bret Cahill
Punishment of evil doers does not cause utopia to break out because it is does not change the _situation_.
What part of "situation" do you not understand?
Unless someone does something about legacy media Big Lies, rest assured, the next _DNC chair_ will be even worse.
the legacy media's demise will not prevent the next bill clinton.
But as long as they are alive you _guarantee_ the status quo.
Post by nickname unavailable
a informed public however will.
Not going to happen with the legacy media shills jerryspringerizing politics.
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
"You are satisfied with so little."
-- Nietzsche
i will not be satisfied till the constitution is restored.
Then you won't be satisfied because that can _not_ happen with legacy media shills jerryspringerizing politics.


Bret Cahill
nickname unavailable
2016-06-13 20:45:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
no matter how many countries we destabilize, no matter how many we displace, murder, steal their democracies, free trade will not work: The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
i fear for the safety of the world from a free trader more than trump.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article44851.htm
The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
By Nil Nikandrov
June 11, 2016 "Information Clearing House" - "SCF" - US intelligence agencies have ramped up their operations intended to remove Bolivian President Evo Morales from office. All options are on the table, including assassination. Barack Obama, who sees the weakening of Latin America’s “hostile bloc of populist states” as one of his administration’s foreign-policy victories, intends to buoy this success before stepping down.
Washington also feels under the gun in Bolivia because of China’s successful expansion in the country. Morales is steadily strengthening his financial, economic, trade, and military relationship with Beijing. Chinese businesses in La Paz are thriving – making investments and loans and taking part in projects to secure a key position for Bolivia in the modernization of the continent’s transportation industry. In the next 10 years, thanks to Bolivia’s plentiful gas reserves, that country will become the energy hub of South America. Evo Morales sees his country’s development as his top priority, and the Chinese, unlike the Americans, have always viewed Bolivia as an ally and partner in a relationship that eschews double standards.
Unless it's a war few voters care about international affairs.
when the missiles hit their doorsteps, they will care.
Bolivia has no missiles.
Voters don't care what the U. S. does in these countries.
but china does. china has billions invested in bolivia, as it does in many other countries we are destabilizing all over the world to keep china a colony.
same thing is happening with europe and its increased trade with russia. this will all end poorly, free trade always does. free trade is used as a hammer, to tie others to us. it works in the short term when we have something to offer, but in the long term once we have nothing, which we warned clinton that would happen soon.
we saw it in 2000 when 65,000 factories went to china, then what do we have left to offer, technology, nope, that's gone, we are a net importer of technology. manufactured products, nope, same there. financial products, we see how well that worked, the dollar and the military, that's it.
so if you do not understand why the hillay type is so eager to destroy your constitution, your country, your sovereignty, your standard of living, its in the vain hope to hang onto empire.
free trade always ends in war. i fear a free trader in office more than trump. china nor russia will not stand for this for long.
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Again, the only effective political action at this point is to expose the big lies of the legacy media. Every other activism is either useless or a new evil.
its a two for one affair now, as it always has been.
There's only one field operation at a time.
no two.
Two is unusual in farming, non existent in politics as Montesquieu pointed out.
You have one real operation now and driving a combine around in the field like what you want to do just kills all the sprouts.
modern combines have two sides. neo-liberals simply will not go away because the legacy media gets outed.
But outing the media must be done _first_.
You're hungry for some food but you'll only get hungrier if you keep driving that combine around in the field.
There's no wheat there.
i worked on them in the 1990's, to no avail. its the economics, that is their achilles heel.
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
out the shills everywhere, its the right thing to do.
It takes more than the right position papers.
You need to do the right issue at the right time.
i have. its why bernie felt it was the right time. but in reality, it was not the right person. we needed a trump on the left, a street fighter.
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
"When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils, but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil."
-- Montesquieu
wasserman shultz backed off, even though she had full support of the legacy media, because we rightfully demonized her.
They get someone even worse.
the one running against her is endorsed by bernie.
How does that cause the next DNC chair to become progressive? They have a list of job applicants "this high" to replace one shill after another shill after another shill.
You may like mowing mushrooms but most like to actually _accomplish_ something.
You're entire approach to politics is "get rid of bad guys and utopia will break out."
Look how well that worked for W. Bush getting rid of bad guy Saddam.
Nader punished Al Gore and destroyed the middle class.
clinton destroyed the middle class.
Punishment based politics does not result in progress.
i and millions, perhaps billions want a example. but more than that, fascism must be put out to pasture, and made a dirty word. what cromwell did for england worked for centuries. it was the economics of it, that is what he was after. when you make a example, people will remember, free trade, deregulation, privatization, tax breaks for wall street, why, that is what the fascist clinton did.
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
not bush, shame on you bret.
Post by Bret Cahill
Punishment of evil doers does not cause utopia to break out because it is does not change the _situation_.
What part of "situation" do you not understand?
Unless someone does something about legacy media Big Lies, rest assured, the next _DNC chair_ will be even worse.
the legacy media's demise will not prevent the next bill clinton.
But as long as they are alive you _guarantee_ the status quo.
i never say never.
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
a informed public however will.
Not going to happen with the legacy media shills jerryspringerizing politics.
they will never go away. to much money. as you wack down one, another will pop up. just to much money.
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
"You are satisfied with so little."
-- Nietzsche
i will not be satisfied till the constitution is restored.
Then you won't be satisfied because that can _not_ happen with legacy media shills jerryspringerizing politics.
and there is to much money that will make sure that they will never go away.
Post by Bret Cahill
Bret Cahill
Bret Cahill
2016-06-13 21:22:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
no matter how many countries we destabilize, no matter how many we displace, murder, steal their democracies, free trade will not work: The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
i fear for the safety of the world from a free trader more than trump.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article44851.htm
The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
By Nil Nikandrov
June 11, 2016 "Information Clearing House" - "SCF" - US intelligence agencies have ramped up their operations intended to remove Bolivian President Evo Morales from office. All options are on the table, including assassination. Barack Obama, who sees the weakening of Latin America’s “hostile bloc of populist states” as one of his administration’s foreign-policy victories, intends to buoy this success before stepping down.
Washington also feels under the gun in Bolivia because of China’s successful expansion in the country. Morales is steadily strengthening his financial, economic, trade, and military relationship with Beijing. Chinese businesses in La Paz are thriving – making investments and loans and taking part in projects to secure a key position for Bolivia in the modernization of the continent’s transportation industry. In the next 10 years, thanks to Bolivia’s plentiful gas reserves, that country will become the energy hub of South America. Evo Morales sees his country’s development as his top priority, and the Chinese, unlike the Americans, have always viewed Bolivia as an ally and partner in a relationship that eschews double standards.
Unless it's a war few voters care about international affairs.
when the missiles hit their doorsteps, they will care.
Bolivia has no missiles.
Voters don't care what the U. S. does in these countries.
but china does. china has billions invested in bolivia, as it does in many other countries we are destabilizing all over the world to keep china a colony.
same thing is happening with europe and its increased trade with russia. this will all end poorly, free trade always does. free trade is used as a hammer, to tie others to us. it works in the short term when we have something to offer, but in the long term once we have nothing, which we warned clinton that would happen soon.
we saw it in 2000 when 65,000 factories went to china, then what do we have left to offer, technology, nope, that's gone, we are a net importer of technology. manufactured products, nope, same there. financial products, we see how well that worked, the dollar and the military, that's it.
so if you do not understand why the hillay type is so eager to destroy your constitution, your country, your sovereignty, your standard of living, its in the vain hope to hang onto empire.
free trade always ends in war. i fear a free trader in office more than trump. china nor russia will not stand for this for long.
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Again, the only effective political action at this point is to expose the big lies of the legacy media. Every other activism is either useless or a new evil.
its a two for one affair now, as it always has been.
There's only one field operation at a time.
no two.
Two is unusual in farming, non existent in politics as Montesquieu pointed out.
You have one real operation now and driving a combine around in the field like what you want to do just kills all the sprouts.
modern combines have two sides. neo-liberals simply will not go away because the legacy media gets outed.
But outing the media must be done _first_.
You're hungry for some food but you'll only get hungrier if you keep driving that combine around in the field.
There's no wheat there.
i worked on them in the 1990's, to no avail.
Like I said, there's no wheat there.
Post by nickname unavailable
its the economics, that is their achilles heel.
Most are getting poorer and the rich richer, and not just richer but more entrenched politically.
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
out the shills everywhere, its the right thing to do.
It takes more than the right position papers.
You need to do the right issue at the right time.
i have. its why bernie felt it was the right time.
It was the right time and to some extent the right issue.

It just wasn't the right way and the right amount to hype the right issue.
Post by nickname unavailable
but in reality, it was not the right person. we needed a trump on the left, a street fighter.
As Sanders own aid pointed out, Sanders did well as long as he stayed out of the knife fight.

Actually a knife fight would be OK with the media. You do not alienate any potential allies.

It's just pure progress.
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
"When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils, but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil."
-- Montesquieu
wasserman shultz backed off, even though she had full support of the legacy media, because we rightfully demonized her.
They get someone even worse.
the one running against her is endorsed by bernie.
How does that cause the next DNC chair to become progressive? They have a list of job applicants "this high" to replace one shill after another shill after another shill.
You may like mowing mushrooms but most like to actually _accomplish_ something.
You're entire approach to politics is "get rid of bad guys and utopia will break out."
Look how well that worked for W. Bush getting rid of bad guy Saddam.
Nader punished Al Gore and destroyed the middle class.
clinton destroyed the middle class.
Punishment based politics does not result in progress.
i and millions, perhaps billions want a example. but more than that, fascism must be put out to pasture, and made a dirty word. what cromwell did for england worked for centuries.
Different situation. We already have all the trappings of democracy. The _only_ reason our system isn't functioning as a democracy is because of the media.
Post by nickname unavailable
it was the economics of it, that is what he was after. when you make a example, people will remember, free trade, deregulation, privatization, tax breaks for wall street, why, that is what the fascist clinton did.
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
not bush, shame on you bret.
Post by Bret Cahill
Punishment of evil doers does not cause utopia to break out because it is does not change the _situation_.
What part of "situation" do you not understand?
Unless someone does something about legacy media Big Lies, rest assured, the next _DNC chair_ will be even worse.
the legacy media's demise will not prevent the next bill clinton.
But as long as they are alive you _guarantee_ the status quo.
i never say never.
Try a cost benefit risk analysis approach and you get the same conclusion:

You need to spend nearly all your time eliminating legacy media noise.

That's how they censor: They make noise and call it free speech.
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
a informed public however will.
Not going to happen with the legacy media shills jerryspringerizing politics.
they will never go away.
Actually they shut up over night.

One mass fax 14 months ago and only one more peep about "two vibrant political parties" by J. Chait who didn't get a copy.

It's like driving swords into the magician's box except there is no trap door. You force them to contort so much they realize it is more comfortable in the productive sector.
Post by nickname unavailable
to much money. as you wack down one, another will pop up. just to much money.
That's why you need to expose _tactics_.

It's hard for them to establish a new culture war du jour every day.
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
"You are satisfied with so little."
-- Nietzsche
i will not be satisfied till the constitution is restored.
Then you won't be satisfied because that can _not_ happen with legacy media shills jerryspringerizing politics.
and there is to much money that will make sure that they will never go away.
Why would anyone pay them if they aren't effective shills?

Bezos realizes that he was swindled by the Graham family.

Bob Graham "merely omitted" telling the looneytarian that it was not worth much.

Evidence of reasons to believe opportunity abounds _abounds_.

Think of it this way. You are trying to talk to someone on the phone. A child or dog is barking or making noise. You say, "excuse me for a second" and put the dog outside.

Once it's quiet again _then_ and only _then_ do you resume the conversation.

Same with the legacy media.


Bret Cahill
nickname unavailable
2016-06-15 06:52:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
no matter how many countries we destabilize, no matter how many we displace, murder, steal their democracies, free trade will not work: The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
i fear for the safety of the world from a free trader more than trump.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article44851.htm
The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
By Nil Nikandrov
June 11, 2016 "Information Clearing House" - "SCF" - US intelligence agencies have ramped up their operations intended to remove Bolivian President Evo Morales from office. All options are on the table, including assassination. Barack Obama, who sees the weakening of Latin America’s “hostile bloc of populist states” as one of his administration’s foreign-policy victories, intends to buoy this success before stepping down.
Washington also feels under the gun in Bolivia because of China’s successful expansion in the country. Morales is steadily strengthening his financial, economic, trade, and military relationship with Beijing. Chinese businesses in La Paz are thriving – making investments and loans and taking part in projects to secure a key position for Bolivia in the modernization of the continent’s transportation industry. In the next 10 years, thanks to Bolivia’s plentiful gas reserves, that country will become the energy hub of South America. Evo Morales sees his country’s development as his top priority, and the Chinese, unlike the Americans, have always viewed Bolivia as an ally and partner in a relationship that eschews double standards.
Unless it's a war few voters care about international affairs.
when the missiles hit their doorsteps, they will care.
Bolivia has no missiles.
Voters don't care what the U. S. does in these countries.
but china does. china has billions invested in bolivia, as it does in many other countries we are destabilizing all over the world to keep china a colony.
same thing is happening with europe and its increased trade with russia. this will all end poorly, free trade always does. free trade is used as a hammer, to tie others to us. it works in the short term when we have something to offer, but in the long term once we have nothing, which we warned clinton that would happen soon.
we saw it in 2000 when 65,000 factories went to china, then what do we have left to offer, technology, nope, that's gone, we are a net importer of technology. manufactured products, nope, same there. financial products, we see how well that worked, the dollar and the military, that's it.
so if you do not understand why the hillay type is so eager to destroy your constitution, your country, your sovereignty, your standard of living, its in the vain hope to hang onto empire.
free trade always ends in war. i fear a free trader in office more than trump. china nor russia will not stand for this for long.
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Again, the only effective political action at this point is to expose the big lies of the legacy media. Every other activism is either useless or a new evil.
its a two for one affair now, as it always has been.
There's only one field operation at a time.
no two.
Two is unusual in farming, non existent in politics as Montesquieu pointed out.
You have one real operation now and driving a combine around in the field like what you want to do just kills all the sprouts.
modern combines have two sides. neo-liberals simply will not go away because the legacy media gets outed.
But outing the media must be done _first_.
You're hungry for some food but you'll only get hungrier if you keep driving that combine around in the field.
There's no wheat there.
i worked on them in the 1990's, to no avail.
Like I said, there's no wheat there.
the legacy media is like whack a mole. you keep after them, i get read by at least a half a million people daily.
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
its the economics, that is their achilles heel.
Most are getting poorer and the rich richer, and not just richer but more entrenched politically.
that is true. its why hillary if she wins, might be a one termer.
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
out the shills everywhere, its the right thing to do.
It takes more than the right position papers.
You need to do the right issue at the right time.
i have. its why bernie felt it was the right time.
It was the right time and to some extent the right issue.
It just wasn't the right way and the right amount to hype the right issue.
all true. he was to easy on the clintons that is for sure. the youth despise the clintons.
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
but in reality, it was not the right person. we needed a trump on the left, a street fighter.
As Sanders own aid pointed out, Sanders did well as long as he stayed out of the knife fight.
Actually a knife fight would be OK with the media. You do not alienate any potential allies.
It's just pure progress.
both with the media and the neo-liberal democrats.
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
"When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils, but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil."
-- Montesquieu
wasserman shultz backed off, even though she had full support of the legacy media, because we rightfully demonized her.
They get someone even worse.
the one running against her is endorsed by bernie.
How does that cause the next DNC chair to become progressive? They have a list of job applicants "this high" to replace one shill after another shill after another shill.
You may like mowing mushrooms but most like to actually _accomplish_ something.
You're entire approach to politics is "get rid of bad guys and utopia will break out."
Look how well that worked for W. Bush getting rid of bad guy Saddam.
Nader punished Al Gore and destroyed the middle class.
clinton destroyed the middle class.
Punishment based politics does not result in progress.
i and millions, perhaps billions want a example. but more than that, fascism must be put out to pasture, and made a dirty word. what cromwell did for england worked for centuries.
Different situation. We already have all the trappings of democracy. The _only_ reason our system isn't functioning as a democracy is because of the media.
you place to much on that. we have the internet. its why the youth almost put bernie over the top. its more bret, its the shills in general.
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
it was the economics of it, that is what he was after. when you make a example, people will remember, free trade, deregulation, privatization, tax breaks for wall street, why, that is what the fascist clinton did.
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
not bush, shame on you bret.
Post by Bret Cahill
Punishment of evil doers does not cause utopia to break out because it is does not change the _situation_.
What part of "situation" do you not understand?
Unless someone does something about legacy media Big Lies, rest assured, the next _DNC chair_ will be even worse.
the legacy media's demise will not prevent the next bill clinton.
But as long as they are alive you _guarantee_ the status quo.
i never say never.
You need to spend nearly all your time eliminating legacy media noise.
That's how they censor: They make noise and call it free speech.
and they will keep making that noise no matter how many mole you whack, another one pops right up. fox news is a master at it.
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
a informed public however will.
Not going to happen with the legacy media shills jerryspringerizing politics.
they will never go away.
Actually they shut up over night.
One mass fax 14 months ago and only one more peep about "two vibrant political parties" by J. Chait who didn't get a copy.
It's like driving swords into the magician's box except there is no trap door. You force them to contort so much they realize it is more comfortable in the productive sector.
they will just ignore you.
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
to much money. as you wack down one, another will pop up. just to much money.
That's why you need to expose _tactics_.
It's hard for them to establish a new culture war du jour every day.
fox does that well.
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
Post by Bret Cahill
"You are satisfied with so little."
-- Nietzsche
i will not be satisfied till the constitution is restored.
Then you won't be satisfied because that can _not_ happen with legacy media shills jerryspringerizing politics.
and there is to much money that will make sure that they will never go away.
Why would anyone pay them if they aren't effective shills?
Bezos realizes that he was swindled by the Graham family.
Bob Graham "merely omitted" telling the looneytarian that it was not worth much.
Evidence of reasons to believe opportunity abounds _abounds_.
Think of it this way. You are trying to talk to someone on the phone. A child or dog is barking or making noise. You say, "excuse me for a second" and put the dog outside.
Once it's quiet again _then_ and only _then_ do you resume the conversation.
Same with the legacy media.
and they will find another way. no movement like the .01% ever go down quietly. they will spring stuff up faster than you can imagine.
Post by Bret Cahill
Bret Cahill
d***@agent.com
2016-06-13 06:34:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
By Nil Nikandrov, June 11, 2016 [...]
Unless it's a war few voters care about international affairs.
the only effective political action is to expose the lies of the
media. Every other activism is either useless or a new evil.
"When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of
remedying any of the growing evils, but by removing the
corruption & restoring its lost principles; every other
correction is either useless or a new evil."
-- Montesquieu
"Peace is a natural effect of trade."
--Montesquieu
Bret Cahill
2016-06-13 15:28:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@agent.com
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
By Nil Nikandrov, June 11, 2016 [...]
Unless it's a war few voters care about international affairs.
the only effective political action is to expose the lies of the
media. Every other activism is either useless or a new evil.
"When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of
remedying any of the growing evils, but by removing the
corruption & restoring its lost principles; every other
correction is either useless or a new evil."
-- Montesquieu
"Peace is a natural effect of trade."
--Montesquieu
The issue is _free_ trade.

Since the supporters of free trade won't answer The Question then it's not free trade. It's not even tariffed trade.

It's a swindle.

The easiest way to get a war started is to do some trillion dollar swindling.


Bret Cahill
d***@agent.com
2016-06-14 04:14:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by d***@agent.com
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
By Nil Nikandrov, June 11, 2016 [...]
Unless it's a war few voters care about international affairs.
the only effective political action is to expose the lies of the
media. Every other activism is either useless or a new evil.
"When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of
remedying any of the growing evils, but by removing the
corruption & restoring its lost principles; every other
correction is either useless or a new evil."
-- Montesquieu
"Peace is a natural effect of trade."
--Montesquieu
The issue is _free_ trade.
According to Montesquieu, the issue is /trade/!
Bret Cahill
2016-06-14 05:03:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@agent.com
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by d***@agent.com
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
By Nil Nikandrov, June 11, 2016 [...]
Unless it's a war few voters care about international affairs.
the only effective political action is to expose the lies of the
media. Every other activism is either useless or a new evil.
"When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of
remedying any of the growing evils, but by removing the
corruption & restoring its lost principles; every other
correction is either useless or a new evil."
-- Montesquieu
"Peace is a natural effect of trade."
--Montesquieu
The issue is _free_ trade.
According to Montesquieu, the issue is /trade/!
OK, some tariffs are good.

After all, tariffs are a form of taxes and taxes are correlative to freedom.
d***@agent.com
2016-06-14 19:42:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by d***@agent.com
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by d***@agent.com
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
By Nil Nikandrov, June 11, 2016 [...]
Unless it's a war few voters care about international affairs.
the only effective political action is to expose the lies of the
media. Every other activism is either useless or a new evil.
"When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of
remedying any of the growing evils, but by removing the
corruption & restoring its lost principles; every other
correction is either useless or a new evil."
-- Montesquieu
"Peace is a natural effect of trade."
--Montesquieu
The issue is _free_ trade.
According to Montesquieu, the issue is /trade/!
OK, some tariffs are good.
tariffs are a form of taxes and taxes are correlative to freedom.
Free trade is correlative to freedom!
nickname unavailable
2016-06-15 06:44:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@agent.com
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by d***@agent.com
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by d***@agent.com
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
By Nil Nikandrov, June 11, 2016 [...]
Unless it's a war few voters care about international affairs.
the only effective political action is to expose the lies of the
media. Every other activism is either useless or a new evil.
"When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of
remedying any of the growing evils, but by removing the
corruption & restoring its lost principles; every other
correction is either useless or a new evil."
-- Montesquieu
"Peace is a natural effect of trade."
--Montesquieu
The issue is _free_ trade.
According to Montesquieu, the issue is /trade/!
OK, some tariffs are good.
tariffs are a form of taxes and taxes are correlative to freedom.
Free trade is correlative to freedom!
no it is not. free trade is enslavement. trade is good, bilateral trade means you trade for what you need, sell what you can, make deals that benefit both sides.
free trade is used by corporation to rape the poor. even the IMF now admits it.
nickname unavailable
2016-06-13 16:12:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@agent.com
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by nickname unavailable
The US Is Preparing to Oust President Evo Morales
By Nil Nikandrov, June 11, 2016 [...]
Unless it's a war few voters care about international affairs.
the only effective political action is to expose the lies of the
media. Every other activism is either useless or a new evil.
"When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of
remedying any of the growing evils, but by removing the
corruption & restoring its lost principles; every other
correction is either useless or a new evil."
-- Montesquieu
"Peace is a natural effect of trade."
--Montesquieu
you have no logic skills at all. china does not free trade with bolivia. but the united states is trying to force all of south america into free trading with us, locking out china.
you should stick to trying to legitimize the useless eaters theory. even then, you are a failure.
w***@gmail.com
2016-06-13 11:59:41 UTC
Permalink
Free trade causes unemployment here because businesses move to where wage rates are lower. It helps exporters to sell their goods in other countries and can reduce some prices here. On Sunday, June 12, 2016 at 10:45:14 PM UTC-4, nickname unavailable wrote something.
Loading...